Tour of Doom
Trap Continuous

Tour of Doom

  • View:
  • 3407




During your opponent's Standby Phase, toss a coin. ● Heads: Your opponent cannot Normal Summon or Flip Summon until the End Phase. ● Tails: You cannot Normal Summon or Flip Summon during your next turn.




 
 
AI Power Analysis
Floodgate / ControlConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 7, 2026
51± 8/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic 53
Deck 50

Tour of Doom — Power Evaluation

Final Score: 51 ± 8 · Confidence: Medium

  • Intrinsic: 53 · Deck: 50 · Meta: provisional
  • Primary role: Floodgate / Control

Why it scores here

Tour of Doom is a generic continuous trap whose value is a 50/50 coin-flip summon lock at the opponent's Standby Phase. Heads stops Normal and Flip Summons until End Phase, but tails locks the controller's own summons for the next turn, so the effect is soft and self-restricting. The card earns its score from accessibility as a generic trap and from its clean, cheap slot cost. It earns little from combo conversion or resource economy, since no combo or card-advantage evidence is supplied. Its 12-deck presence and five archetypes confirm it is a real, portable staple, not evidence of raw power.

Axis scores

Axis Score Evidence
Accessibility 60 A generic face-down trap that is live once set; 12 of 12 sampled decks run it at 1.67 copies average, with no combo starter data (inferred, observed).
Combo & Conversion 25 Does nothing beyond the summon lock itself and no combo examples are supplied, so conversion is text-only (inferred).
Resource Economy 30 Spends one card for a tempo lock with no refuel, search, or advantage; no netCardAdvantage data (verified, inferred).
Effect & Interaction 50 Soft interaction: a summon lock that is coin-dependent and symmetric in the tails case; no negation or removal (verified).
Material Utility 5 A continuous trap has no monster body and cannot serve as material (verified).
Resilience & Flexibility 40 Stays on the field across turns but is a face-down backrow card that can be destroyed by backrow removal (inferred).
Deck-Building Efficiency 70 One slot, no garnet or lock cost, splashable and redundant copies are acceptable; the tails self-lock is the only restriction (verified).

Calculation

Weight profile: Floodgate / Control primary role (single role, no blend). Intrinsic ≈ 53, Deck ≈ 50, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: Self-locking restriction (-2). Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck

Strengths

  • Generic trap that fits into many archetypes without build cost
  • Summon lock can disrupt boards that rely on Normal or Flip Summons
  • Multi-archetype presence confirms portability across homes

Weaknesses

  • Coin flip makes the outcome unreliable
  • Tails locks the user's own summons
  • No card advantage, search, or refuel
  • Face-down backrow vulnerable to backrow removal

Counters / choke points

  • Backrow removal or destruction effects
  • Opponent plays that bypass Normal and Flip Summon, such as Special Summons

Best use

Floodgate / Control. Decks: Arcana Force, Harpie, Greed. Suggested copies: 1.

Evidence & gaps

  • Verified: Card text: opponent Standby Phase coin toss with heads summon lock and tails self-lock; Card type: continuous trap, no monster body; Deck sample: 12 decks, 1.67 copies average, 5 distinct archetypes
  • Observed: Appears in 12 of 12 sampled decks, mostly Arcana Force (50%); Top partners include Arcana Reading and Pot of Extravagance at 58.3% co-occurrence
  • Inferred: Summon lock disrupts Normal and Flip Summon lines but not Special Summon lines; Face-down backrow exposure to backrow removal lowers resilience
  • Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo conversion is text-only inference no guides supplied no banlist token — assumed 3 copies (unlimited) no usage statistics (StatisticsCard) — archetype inclusion % inferred from deck sample only











https://metaduelist.com/
Top